Title: An analysis of media items and its impact on Australian Indigenous people’s health and wellbeing issues.
Value: 40 %
Length: up to 1500 words
Due Date: Monday Week 12
BACKGROUND TO TASK:
According to Stoneham, Goodman and Daube (2014), one factor impacting on the relationship of Indigenous Australians with mainstream society is the media portrayal of Indigenous people and issues, in this unit the issue is health. These authors’ examined media portrayals of Indigenous Australians’ public health issues in selected media over a 12-month period.
Before starting assessment 3 read the article titled “The Portrayal of indigenous health in selected Australian media” that you can find in a CDU library search. Notice the comments in the notes and discussion section. Balvin and Kashima (2012) and Larson, Gillies, Howard and Coffin (2007) cited in Stoneham, Goodman and Daube (2014) note that that negative news reporting impacts on the self –esteem Australian Indigenous people and perpetuates Indigenous stereotypes within mainstream society. Larson et al., argue that this is discrimination and a determinant of health and that until change occurs in the perception of the dominant Australian culture, public health, education and employment opportunities will be at risk for Indigenous Australians.
This assignment draws on the work of Stoneham, Goodman and Daube (2014) to provide a framework for you to examine current health and well-being issues related to the health of Australian Indigenous peoples.
This assignment relates to the four learning outcomes for this unit.
AIM:
To explore current health issues affecting the health and wellbeing of Indigenous Australians by examining media items and identifying how media is used to report Australian Indigenous peoples’ health issues
TASK:
- Explore a range of media for news items related to Indigenous Australian’s health. This can include, news items in daily papers, journals, television or radio, websites, magazines. You will need to provide a link to your articles.
- Choose three items about one of the following topics: That is, three items about nutrition, three items about mental health or three items about smoking.
Nutrition
Mental Health
Smoking
- Read the article, analyse and make notes guided by the following criteria:
- Assess each article according to negative, positive or neutral qualities as per Stoneham, Goodman and Daube(2014)p.3.
Hsc203 Indigenous Health Perspectives Assignment 3 1
- Link the issues as presented in the topics with the unit learning outcomes.
CORE CRITERIA AND MARKING RUBRIC.
# | Core Criteria | Marks | |||||||||
1 | Identify one key measure in each media item | 15% | |||||||||
Link literature to relevant data | |||||||||||
Marking | |||||||||||
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Limited | Unsatisfactory | |||||||
(15-13) | (12-10) | (9 -6) | (5-3) | (2-0) | |||||||
Excellent | Good overview | Satisfactory | Limited coverage of | Minimal | |||||||
overview and link | and link to | overview and link to | media item and | understanding of | |||||||
to current | relevant data/and | data | literature link to data | core criteria | |||||||
data/statistics | statistics | ||||||||||
2 | Link the health issue with one or more of the unit learning outcomes | 15% | |||||||||
Marking | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Limited | Unsatisfactory | ||||||
(15-13) | (12-10) | (9 -6) | (5-3) | (2-0) | |||||||
Insightful, well- | Good | Demonstrated an | Limited evidence and | Minimal | |||||||
structured and | understanding | understanding of | comprehension of | development of | |||||||
excellent | and competence | criteria. | criteria. | core criteria. | |||||||
understanding of | in addressing core | ||||||||||
the criteria. | criteria. | ||||||||||
3 | Identify the positive, negative or neutral qualities of the media items | 25% | |||||||||
Marking | |||||||||||
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Limited | Unsatisfactory | |||||||
(25-22) | (21 – 17) | (16-11) | (10-5) | (5-0) | |||||||
Excellent | Provides a clear | Reasonable | Limited | Unsatisfactory | |||||||
identification of | understanding of | identification of | understanding of | identification of | |||||||
the media | media qualities. | media items | media items | media items | |||||||
qualities. | |||||||||||
4 | Briefly explore the impact of the positive, negative or neutral qualities of the media items 30% | ||||||||||
Marking | could have on the reader. | ||||||||||
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Limited | Unsatisfactory | |||||||
(30- 26) | (25 – 19) | (18- 12) | (11- 5) | (5-0) | |||||||
Insightful analysis | Provides a very | Demonstrated an | Limited connection | Core criteria is | |||||||
of the influences | good | understanding of | to how media can | not clearly | |||||||
of media items | understanding of | core criteria. | influence reders | identified. | |||||||
media items and | |||||||||||
influence | |||||||||||
5 | Written Expression, structure, logical sequencing and flow of information. Clear direction 10% | |||||||||||
Marking | ||||||||||||
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Limited | Unsatisfactory | ||||||||
(9-10) | (7-8) | (5-6) | (4-3) | (0-2) | ||||||||
Provides excellent | Provides clear | Generally | Limited direction for | Minimal direction | ||||||||
logical sequencing | logical sequencing | satisfactory direction | the reader. Limited | provided, poor | ||||||||
and flow of | and flow of | for the reader with | logical sequencing | attention to | ||||||||
information. | information. Clear | logical sequencing | and flow of | logical | ||||||||
Excellent | written | and flow of | information. | sequencing and | ||||||||
attention to | expression | information. Written | Awkward written | flow of | ||||||||
spelling, | Consistent | expression and | expression with | information. | ||||||||
grammar, | attention to | clarity is satisfactory. | limited ability to | Written | ||||||||
punctuation and | correct spelling, | Spelling, grammar, | express clearly. | expression lacks | ||||||||
syntax. | grammar, and | punctuation needs a | Insufficient attention | clarity and | ||||||||
punctuation | little attention. | to correct spelling, | cohesion. | |||||||||
grammar, | Frequent spelling, | |||||||||||
punctuation and | punctuation and | |||||||||||
syntax. | grammatical | |||||||||||
errors. | ||||||||||||
6 | Referencing CDU APA 6th referencing style | 5% | ||||||||||
Clearly Labelled assignment file as requested | ||||||||||||
Font Verdana or Arial, size 12, Line spacing 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Checked for plagiarism | ||||||||||||
Marking | ||||||||||||
Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Limited | Unsatisfactory | ||||||||
(5) | (4) | (3) | (2) | (0-1) | ||||||||
Exemplary | Referencing | General referencing, | Limited attention | Absence of | ||||||||
referencing and | conventions and | including citation | paid to referencing, | referencing & | ||||||||
citation. All | citations usually | conventions are | including citation | citation | ||||||||
conventions | correct and | followed. | Clearly Labelled | conventions | ||||||||
followed. | consistent. Few | Clearly Labelled | assignment file as | overall. | ||||||||
Clearly Labelled | errors. | assignment file as | requested | Assignment not | ||||||||
assignment file as | Clearly Labelled | requested | labelled as | |||||||||
requested | assignment file as | requested | ||||||||||
requested | ||||||||||||
Total | 100% | |||||||||||