ASSESSMENT OF THE POSTER

Select assessed student from the drop down list

Choose

Innovation / Creativity / Originality (…/10)

• Does the (research and design) work demonstrate: Innovation / Creativity / Originality?

Clear and Effective Communication (…/10)

• Was the flow of presentation logical?
• Were the graphics and text clear?
• Were the graphs/analysis/concepts well explained?
• Is the problem statement clear?
• Are the objectives appropriate?
• Did student explain clearly the objectives of their projects?
• Are all the research questions completely answered?
• Was the student able to relate the facts, theories and processes presented?

Research and Design Method (…/10)

• Was the literature review well presented?
• Was gap in knowledge identified and well presented?
• Have sufficient literatures and materials been reviewed as benchmarks and verifications of the projects?
• Literature review relevancy, critical remarks, correct sourcing, etc.?

Design and Project Management (…/10)

(a) For projects with experiments/simulation/analytical:

• Was there systematic engineering synthesis and design process applied to develop analytical model and/or computer simulation and/or experimental rig?
• Are the tools and equipment been identified and appropriate for the project?
• Are the techniques and methodologies to tackle the project extensively covered?
• Were there any implementation issues and challenges?
• Were there any timeline for deliverables and milestones?

(b)For projects with management:

• Was there a systematic approach applied to conduct and manage an engineering project?
• Are the sub-tasks and phases of the project properly defined?
• Are reasonable time frame and budget allocated for each phase?

Critical Analysis (…/10)

• Was the analysis critical and the conclusions well justified?
• What is the level of achievement with respect to the objectives?

Possible comments on Poster; possible comments to justify the marks

For REF… Use: #getanswers2001704