Looking for BSBADM502 Manage Meetings Assessment Task 2 Question to Answers? Gets BSBADM502 Assignment 2 Part B- Supporting Document Selection Report, HRM Assignment Sample & Management Case Study Help from PhD/MBA Experts at cost-effective rates? Acquire HD Quality research work with 100% Plagiarism free content – Get related MBA Assignment Help & Topics written by native Expert writers in USA, U.K. & Australia.
BSBADM502 Manage Meetings Assessment Task 2 Answers
Selection report
Panel’s recommendation to Human resources manager
To (Delegate): | Human Resources Manager |
From: | Principal Consultant |
Date: | 04-Nov-15 |
Job Title | Accounts Manager | ||
Salary | $110,000 per annum plus superannuation | Location | Head Office |
Selection Panel
Name | Position | |
Chair: | Paul Burn | Principal Consultant |
Member: | Helen Sykes | Client Services Officer |
RECOMMENDATION
That you approve the selection of Maggie Perez to the above-described vacancy.
The panel has sighted satisfactory proof of Maggie Perez’s qualifications.
BASIS FOR SHORTLISTING
Must meet selection criteria.
APPLICANTS NOT GIVEN FURTHER CONSIDERATION
# | APPLICANT NAME | Brief Info about Applicant and Basis for not Considering Further |
1 | Jamie Palms | No experience in accounts management, degree in accounting only. |
2 | Philip Baird | Working as an Accounts Officer. Appears to be much lower level of work and responsibility. No higher education qualifications. |
3 | Asha Singh | Is an Administration Manager with some financial responsibilities – does not have direct experience in accounts management. |
APPLICANTS SHORTLISTED FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION:
Three applicants were identified for further consideration and assessment by the panel on the merit principle – that is, overall suitability for this vacancy having regard to work history, education and qualifications, experience in related areas at appropriate levels of responsibility, knowledge, and skill and potential for development as verified by appropriate referees.
The names of these shortlisted applicants and a summary of their claims and the information gathered about them is set out in a separate section for each applicant in the table below.
Summary of the Claims and Information Gathered About Shortlisted Applicants
Applicant’s Name: Mr James Strong | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes regarding previous work history, level, experience, education, qualifications:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Referee Information:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Applicant Selection Criteria Assessment:
Rating Scale: 3 = Fully Satisfies 2 = Partially Satisfies 1 = Does Not Satisfy (+ and – may be used) General Comments: James is keen to progress his career in accounts management. He is very enthusiastic and has good communication skills. |
Applicant’s Name: Ms Maggie Perez Applicant’s Address: 2/5 Belmont Gardens VIC 2573. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes regarding previous work history, level, experience, education, qualifications:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Referee Information:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Applicant Selection Criteria Assessment:
Rating Scale: 3 = Fully Satisfies 2 = Partially Satisfies 1 = Does Not Satisfy (+ and – may be used) General Comments: Maggie is clearly experienced. Her calm manner would be a plus in what could be a stressful role. |
Applicant’s Name: Mr Ben Joseph Applicant’s Address: 9 Marchmont Terrace, Viewlands VIC 2874. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes regarding previous work history, level, experience, education, qualifications:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Referee Information:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Applicant Selection Criteria Assessment:
Rating Scale: 3 = Fully Satisfies 2 = Partially Satisfies 1 = Does Not Satisfy (+ and – may be used) General Comments: Ben has potential but at this stage does not appear to be ready for the role. |
COMPARATIVE DISCUSSION AND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
The preferred candidate, Maggie Perez, has high levels of experience working as an Accounts Manager and is currently employed in a large corporation as an Accounts Manager, In total she has approximately 10 years experience in accounts management.
The panel recommends Ms Perez. She has been an excellent performer in her current and previous employment as verified by two referees. She has demonstrated through her performance that she has the required capabilities, and her tertiary qualifications, and her higher level attention to detail and management skills are useful to her in the role.
One other applicant, James, has a comparable amount of as an Accounts Manager and referees verified that he is very capable. The panel has no doubt that he is also suitable but felt that the Maggie’s experience in supervising staff made her stand out as the preferred candidate. James appears to have the ability to supervise staff.
The other applicantdid not have a higher education qualification as per the qualification requirements of the position although he did have experience in most of the requirements of the position and a high level VET qualification. However, the interview and referee responses showed that he may struggle with managing staff.
PANEL RECOMMENDATION:
For the reasons detailed above, and based on heroverall suitability having regard to experience, knowledge, skill, qualificationsand potential,Maggie Perezis regarded as the most suitable applicant and is recommended by the selection panel for the role of Accounts Manager.
All qualifications, certificates and other requirements for the job such as criminal history checks to verify the applicant’s suitability have been sighted by the selection panel.
Signed:
Panel Members
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER APPROVAL:
The Human Resources Manager will consider whether the selection process and procedure provided an adequate assessment of the applicants’ suitability, and whether the selection is supportable on the evidence.
If the panel’s recommendation is not approved by the Delegate, comment should be provided by the Delegate explaining the reasons.
NDORSED/NOT ENDORSED (circle option)
________________________
Human Resources Manager
Date: ________
Summary of reasons for endorsing/not endorsing panel’s decision:
The Human Resources Manager should provide comment on whether:
- the recommendation of the selection panel is consistent with the merit principle (i.e. is clearly based on overall suitability having regard to knowledge, skill, experience and qualification, and potential for future development) and supported by evidence and examples including verification from well-placed referees
- the written explanation of the decision is clear, understandable, and well explained in terms of the merit of the selected applicant with specific reference to work history, experience, previous levels, qualifications, skill.